nordbergsongs (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Further back in Ancient History (a whopping 30 years ago), Ron Paul was saying the same thing. I guess he's not smart because he predicted this years ago? Please try to access your intelligence, thanks.

GovernmentGoneWild (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

R♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥Copy ♥O♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥And ♥♥N♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥Paste ♥♥♥P♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥This ♥♥♥♥A♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥If ♥♥♥♥♥U♥♥♥♥♥♥You ♥♥♥♥♥♥L♥♥♥♥♥Just ♥♥♥♥AKA♥♥♥♥♥LOVE ♥♥♥UNITED STATED♥♥♥RON PAUL ♥♥♥♥PRESIDENT♥♥♥♥My Hero♥4 EVER ♥

bebz471 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

all hot guys reading this hit me up on MSN Messenger ID jane23belle. im bored xD

alproof (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

anyone want chat?

subzero888888 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Sheesh --- this is from May, and therefore, ancient history. Also, unimpressed that Ron Paul just learned that banks keep a 16 2/3% reserve on all deposits. WHERE's the adult supervision for these volunteered clips...!

silus2000 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

This Assman guy is great. I've never heard a better interview with Ron Paul on Economics. He went through all the big questions I have on our current economic system.

atkrunner (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

That is exactly what I mentioned to my econ professor about 4 years ago. We were actually talking about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and I mentioned to him that it is like the US gov. is running a giant pyramid scheme. We read an article from the Economist in that class which predicted the mortgage crisis.

fairalways (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

You really make it hard for me when you don't follow the post of mine to which you referred. Fair enough. When the poster stated, "Money to me is worth less than you or your life." and so on, he (I assume he) was clearly making an altruistic point. To that I responded.

fairalways (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I was very specific and clear about my intentions as well as my interest in specific answers. Your post implies you are agitated, but (if I recall this ancient thread, which I've no intention of re-reading right now) I am always fair in my desire to expand real discussion, meaning specifics culled from logic, not broad generalities intended to bolster one's ego or show off one's command of language. If you can do this, education level is meaningless.

spyletu (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

well obviously no one knows what your intentions are and there are certainly many ways of bringing about passionate discussions to topics you sincerely wish to talk about. if the way you express your opinions and the topic you choose attract only particular crowds of certain level of education (so low that you deem their input worthless), then.. i am not sure, but i would assume that personal intentions and the communication methods/skills learned out of necessity are always mutual.